Jerry Brust, IPM Vegetable Specialist, University of Maryland; firstname.lastname@example.org
For the last 3 out of 5 years (yes I know, but I get busy with other things) I have been looking at whether or not adding extra sulfur to watermelon is worth it. I was asked a similar question from a couple of Eastern Shore growers awhile back and I said I was not sure and I’d look into it. So this is going to be a quick summary of the results for the three trials, two over on the Eastern Shore and one on the Western Shore. Seeded watermelon was used in 2 years of the study with seedless watermelon used in one year of the study. The set-up is pretty straight forward: soil samples were taken to see what nutrients were needed. Based on this we added the recommended amount of sulfur (we used different soil testing labs and used multi samples with similar results and recs). The average amount of sulfur to add was between 15 and 25 lbs/a for the 3 trials. Once sulfur and the other nutrients were added the treatments were: 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 lbs per acre of extra sulfur being added to the plots. Petiole samples were taken and notes on first flowering, first female flowers, % fruit set, etc. were noted. To save time and because this year’s results were equivalent to the first 2 years of the trial I’ll only show this season’s results. Crimson Sweet was the cultivar used for 2016.
Yields of watermelon were significantly greater in the 20 and 30 extra pounds of sulfur compared with the control (Fig. 1). Over the 3-years of trials there was no significant difference between 20 and 30 lbs. and very little difference between 30 and 40 lbs. So an average addition of 20-30 lbs. is a good starting place.
Figure 1. Yield of watermelon with added amounts of sulfur (lbs/a)
Usually there was no difference in the percent sugar content of the watermelons among any of the sulfur treatments, although for 2016 only the 30 lbs of extra S was significantly greater than the control (Fig. 2). There were no other differences in any of the other measurements between treatments. After two trial years I quit using the 40 lbs of sulfur treatment because that level of sulfur never was much different from the 30 lbs. treatment. I will need to do this study at additional locations for a number of years to be more confident of these results.
Figure 2. Percent sugars in watermelon fruit with differing levels of sulfur.
The reason I am talking about it now is because of what else I did this past year that I should have started 4 years ago. This year I randomly took petiole samples from the watermelon fields. The one thing most of them had in common was a deficiency in sulfur (Fig. 3).
There may have been other deficiencies such as with phosphorous or manganese or nitrogen, etc. but only sulfur was consistently found to be deficient in 52% of the samples with an additional 23% being on the low end of “low”. This was not a big survey (27 fields total; 65% from the Western Shore, 35% from the Eastern Shore) and it was done during a strange weather year and S levels may have been abnormally low. Nevertheless the results of the survey amazed me, so I decided to talk about my sulfur study a little early. For now what growers should do next year, if they are not already doing it, in their watermelon fields is take petiole samples a couple of weeks before first harvest to see where they stand.
I will take more petiole samples from watermelon fields in the coming seasons and repeat the sulfur-additions studies to see if the results hold up. I will talk about the results of the 3-year study in more detail at some of the winter meetings that are coming up. If anyone has any suggestions as to anything else I need to look at in these studies please let me know.
Figure 3. Two examples of petiole nutrient sample results taken from 2 different watermelon