I still haven’t taken a side in this debate, so I figured I’d start with the most interesting side, the one where Tupac Shakur is alive and well today.
The article jumps right into the supposed “facts” that prove the esteemed rapper is still alive, starting with his final album “Makaveli: Don Killuminati: The 7 Day Theory” and how it was named after Niccolo Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher “who believed that faking one’s own death was a sure way to foil his enemies.” The author then goes on to talk about all of the albums released after Tupac’s “death” and how it’s insane that an artist could have this much music already recorded and available to be released. The next point made is in regards to the lyrics of the posthumously released songs, referencing movies and political events that happened after he died.
This article had many points and it summed up the Tupac-is-alive side of the argument well, but it had some ideas that I agree with and some I don’t. What I do agree with is the fact that Tupac has had 9 albums released after his “death” and his lyrics referencing events and movies from after his death. Another thing I agree with that I think is a little sketchy is that Tupac will be releasing another album this year titled “Death Faker”. Weird, right?
What I don’t agree with in this article is the fact that people compare Tupac to Machiavelli. Sure, he released an album called “Makaveli” and read a lot of books about Machiavelli and faking one’s death, but that doesn’t mean he actually was going to follow through with it. I’ve read the Harry Potter books a countless number of times, that doesn’t mean I’m going to try to do magic and attend Hogwarts.
This article has many points that I find interesting and it has many ideas that I want to look into. What I want to look into more is the whole Makaveli-Machiavelli idea. I want to really explore the history of Machiavelli and how Tupac was influenced by him, it all seems so fascinating.
(The article in question)