Delaware Agronomy Blog

University of Delaware Cooperative Extension

Category: pH

Grid Sampling Soils for Variable Rate Lime Applications

Jarrod Miller, Extension Agronomist & James Adkins, Irrigation Engineer

One method to uncover soil variability and crop response is to use precision soil sampling, including either grid or zone methods. These maps can then be used to make variable rate applications, where application rates will change as you cross the field, and GPS helps guide the rates. For this study, soil samples were taken from the upper eight inches of soil on our irrigation research farm in Harbeson, DE. Samples were taken on a 90 by 90-foot grid in April 2022 (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Grid sampling points overlain onto a September 2024 image of the Warrington Irrigation Research Farm, including both center pivot and linear irrigation.

From these grids, maps of nutrients and soil properties were created, including soil pH and buffer pH (Figure 2). Soil pH is measured using water and is the pH your crop will react to. So you use the soil pH measurement to decide if you want to raise or lower your pH. The buffer pH helps figure out any acidity within the soil that will react with lime, causing the need for a higher lime rate (Figure 2b). These two pH measurements were combined using UD recommendations to create a variable rate lime map (target pH = 6.2), which was applied in 2023.

Continue reading

Grid Sampling Soils to Improve Understanding of Soil Variability

Jarrod Miller and James Adkins, University of Delaware

Variability in soil land landscape characteristics reduces yield response to management techniques, particularly regarding seeding rates and fertilizer additions. Yield maps provide a spatial map of yield, which can be associated with drainage issues, soil nutrient holding, or nutrient concentrations. One method to uncover soil variability and crop response is to use precision soil sampling, including either grid or zone methods. Both increase the cost of taking soil samples, and each have their value depending on the desired outcomes.

Continue reading

Using Foliar Manganese Applications to Correct Deficiencies

Amy L. Shober, Professor and Extension Specialist, Nutrient Management and Environmental Quality, ashober@udel.edu; Jarrod O. Miller, Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist, Agronomy, jarrod@udel.edu; Mark Reiter, Associate Professor and Extension Specialist, Soils and Nutrient Management, Virginia Tech, mreiter@vt.edu

 

This image shows areas of the field where the soybeans that were growing in a field ditch (yellow arrow) showing less Mn deficiency symptoms than areas that have better tilth. Figure credit: Jarrod Miller, UD

Soybean is susceptible to manganese (Mn) deficiency, especially when grown on sandy, low organic matter soils like we have in Delaware. Soil Mn availability is a function of both Mn concentration and soil pH. Soil Mn converts to unavailable forms as soil pH increases. So when soil pH starts creeping above 6.2, we can start to see Mn deficiency symptoms. While Mn deficiency can be widespread across the field, we can also see Mn deficiency symptoms in small pockets in a field, often occurring after liming. Deficiency symptoms can be prevalent in areas where lime applications overlapped or where the soil is sandier than the general field; thereby changing pH more quickly and becoming higher than soils with more clay, loam, and/or organic matter. Manganese deficiencies may also reveal themselves with dry soil conditions like we have seen this summer (especially when soils were tilled soils) because soil Mn also becomes less available to plants. Interestingly, Mn deficiencies are less likely in areas of the field that stay wetter (e.g., compacted wheel tracks, field ditches) as wetter soils are less oxygenated, promoting plant available forms of Mn (as seen in the photo below). Continue reading

Nutrient Deficiencies and Toxicities Related to pH, Ca and Mg

We are observing a range of deficiency issues this year in corn, many of which have similar symptoms. Last week we had some images of a field with pale yellow leaves and some interveinal chlorosis that turned out to be a sulfur deficiency (https://sites.udel.edu/weeklycropupdate/?p=15087). This week we have similar symptoms, but a different diagnosis. Across this field (Figure 1), some corn appears pale and stunted, and upon closer inspection (Figure 2), there is also some stripping (interveinal chlorosis) along the leaves. Continue reading